Manual testing is an important part of the software testing process, even with the rise of automated testing. While automation has its benefits, manual testing still provides value that testing tools simply cannot replicate. When executed properly, manual testing provides a human perspective and flexibility that complements automated testing methods. The key is having the right manual testing tools to enhance the work of QA professionals. Here are 5 compelling reasons to use manual testing tools.
Finds Issues That Automated Testing Misses
Automated testing is constrained by its coding. It can only test the predefined use cases and scripts that a developer has created. Human testers have the ability to test “outside the box” and try unexpected test cases. Exploratory testing allows testers to utilize their intuition and experience to find bugs that automation would never uncover. Manual testing tools like bug tracking and screenshot tools augment exploratory testing.
Provides a Better User Perspective
The most important purpose of testing is ensuring high-quality software for end users. Automated testing lacks human intuition and real-world experience. Manual testers can utilize tools to replicate actual user workflows and use cases to find issues. Testing tools can record videos or capture screenshots showing how real users will interact with the software. Automated tests may test individual functions, but only a human can validate the complete user experience.
Allows Testing Without Coding Skills
Automated testing requires specialized coding skills to write and execute test scripts. For testers without coding expertise, manual testing allows them to leverage their talents fully. Using exploratory testing along with tools for tasks like defect tracking, test case management, and screenshots enables effective testing without writing a single line of code. This opens up software QA to a wider range of testing professionals.
Earlier Testing Without Waiting for Coding
Test automation requires time and effort to code the scripts before any tests can run. With manual testing using the appropriate tools, testers can get started evaluating software right away without waiting for automation coding. This provides faster feedback to developers early in the development cycle. Bugs and issues can surface sooner when manual testing starts sooner.
Adaptable to Changing Software
Test automation struggles to keep up with rapidly changing software. When the application changes, the automated scripts need to be updated and maintained. Manual testing provides more flexibility to adapt to changes without breaking existing tests. Using flexible manual testing tools allows testers to evaluate new features or flows quickly. Automation and manual testing used together provides the best software coverage.
Conclusion
While test automation continues to expand, manual testing delivers unique benefits that technology cannot provide. Leveraging the right manual testing tools taps into the human strengths of experience, creativity, and insight. When combined with coded automated testing, manual testing approaches help produce high quality software loved by users. With the right tools, manual testers can thrive and continue proving their worth. The future of software QA relies on using the strengths of both human testers and testing technology together.
